Review




Structured Review

GraphPad Software Inc pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (R) Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (R) Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson’s correlation coefficient(r) calculated in graphpad prism
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient(R) Calculated In Graphpad Prism, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson’s correlation coefficient(r) calculated in graphpad prism/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson’s correlation coefficient(r) calculated in graphpad prism - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc squared pearson correlation coefficient (r 2)
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Squared Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R 2), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/squared pearson correlation coefficient (r 2)/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
squared pearson correlation coefficient (r 2) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio pearson correlation coefficient (r) using r studio
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R) Using R Studio, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson correlation coefficient (r) using r studio/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson correlation coefficient (r) using r studio - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DuPont de Nemours pearson correlation coefficient r
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson Correlation Coefficient R, supplied by DuPont de Nemours, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson correlation coefficient r/product/DuPont de Nemours
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson correlation coefficient r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc pearson correlation coefficient (r) with
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R) With, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson correlation coefficient (r) with/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson correlation coefficient (r) with - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson’s correlation coefficient (r)
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (R), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson’s correlation coefficient (r)/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson correlation coefficient (r) analysis and p value (t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom) calculation
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R) Analysis And P Value (T Distribution With N 2 Degrees Of Freedom) Calculation, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson correlation coefficient (r) analysis and p value (t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom) calculation/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson correlation coefficient (r) analysis and p value (t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom) calculation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson's correlation coefficient (r) with p values calculated using graphpad prism
a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using <t>Pearson’s</t> correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (R) With P Values Calculated Using Graphpad Prism, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson's correlation coefficient (r) with p values calculated using graphpad prism/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson's correlation coefficient (r) with p values calculated using graphpad prism - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Ligand-activated EGFR/MAPK signaling but not PI3K, are key resistance mechanisms to EGFR-therapy in colorectal cancer

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59588-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Scatterplot showing the relationship between gene-level alteration frequencies in ctDNA and archival tissues from ( a ) 141 patients who received prior anti-VEGF therapies, and ( b )113 patients who received prior anti-EGFR therapies. The effect size was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies. Alterations that were absent from tumor tissue samples but detected in plasma samples were defined as emerging alterations. (All genes with at least one emerging alteration listed). Only known and likely oncogenic alterations in each gene were considered for the analysis. P- value was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to compare the percentage of patients with emerging alterations between those who received anti-EGFR therapies and those who received anti-VEGF therapies. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: The effect size was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient(r) calculated in GraphPad Prism, and the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), representing the proportion of variance explained by the relationship, is displayed on the scatter plot. c Comparison of percentage of patients with emerging alterations between patients with prior anti-EGFR therapies and those with prior anti-VEGF therapies.

Techniques: Comparison, Clinical Proteomics, Two Tailed Test